Indian Philosophy fails to say about the Ultimate One True Creator.....

The Bible is saying about the Ultimate Creator with the expression "Father in the Heaven".
The Quran is describing the Ultimate Creator with the expression "Allah".
But what about the case of Sanatan Dharma???
.
Though the Swamijis try to divert people's thinking with their Fascinating Words, yet it is not possible to hide the truth as truth always comes out with the passage of time.
.
.
The first verse of the Bible says,
.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
(The KJV Bible, Genesis, 1:1)
.
The first verse of the Quran says,
.
"In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful."
(Al-Quran, 1:1)
.
So both the Quran & the Bible are saying about the One True Creator.
.
But the first verse of the Veda is saying about nothing but an imaginary diety "Agni"(god of fire) !
.
It is mentioned in the first verse of Rig Veda,
.
"I Laud **Agni**, the chosen Priest, God, minister of sacrifice, The hotar, lavishest of wealth."
(Rig Veda, 1:1:1)
.
[Rig Veda, tr. by Ralph T.H. Griffith,
Source- http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv01001.htm]
.
.
So, we see, Veda from the very beginning is presenting a picture of "Pantheism" instead of showing the concept of "Monotheism".
.
Here, many people try to defend claiming that Indian Philosophy is accepting all kinds of faith.
.
Such claim can be a pleasure, but in comparison to "Perfect Monotheism", Indian Philosophy fails to present the proper concept of One True Ultimate Creator.
.
Renowned Indian Scholar 'Swami Vivekananda' doubts about the existence of the Creator God in his "Complete Works of Vivekananda" like this way:
.
.
"....if they are all created, why does a just and merciful God create one happy and another unhappy, why is He so partial? Nor would it mend matters in the least to hold that those who are miserable in this life will be happy in a future one. Why should a man be miserable even here in the reign of a just and merciful God?
.
In the second place, ***the idea of a creator God does not explain the anomaly***, but simply expresses the cruel fiat of an all-powerful being...."
.
(Complete Works of Vivekananda, Volume 1/Addresses at The Parliament of Religions/Paper on Hinduism)
.
[Source- https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Complete_Works_of_Swami_Vivekananda/Volume_1/Addresses_at_The_Parliament_of_Religions/Paper_on_Hinduism]
.
.
It is as like that Vivekananda is behaving like an Atheist or an Agnostic while saying about the Concept of the Creator.
.
Now let us see a little bit more....
.
According to vedic religion or Hinduism, GOD is considered as “Param Atma”(The Supreme Soul) who created everything from His own portion.
.
“He(the divine Self-existence or God), desiring to produce beings of many kinds from his own body….”
.
(Manusmriti, 01:08)
.
“The Supreme Person(God) in whom all beings abide and by whom all this is pervaded….”
.
(Bhagabat Gita, 8:22)
.
“And when you have thus learned the truth, you will know that all living beings are but part of Me-and that they are in Me, and are Mine.”
.
(Bhagabat Gita, 4:35)
.
So, the universe is actually a transformation of the portion of Param Atma.
.
According to physics, the whole amount of matter and energy is fixed. It can not be created or destroyed, just can be transformed from one to another.
.
Now if a chair is made of wood of a tree, then the chair is actually a transformation of the wood of the tree, it is not actually a new creation in the universe. Here wood is raw material and chair is a new product, but both the elements or the matter of the chair or wood is fixed. So making a chair is not actually a new creation.
.
Similarly, if Purusa or Param Atma makes the universe by transforming His own portion, then it will also not be considered a new creation. Here like the wood of the chair, we can also consider the "Purusa" or "Param Atma" just as raw material, not any Creator.
.
So it is very clear that the Indian Philosophy fails to say about the Ultimate Creator.
Though one may call God as "Siva", "Krishna", "Bhagwan", " Param Atma" etc., from a neutral point of view, there is no description of the Ultimate One True Creator in Indian Philosophy.